<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 490 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, holding that the show cause notice was time-barred as it constituted a change of opinion. Additionally, since the appellant had already reversed the proportionate credit on inputs for the current period, they were not obligated to reverse the Cenvat credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:09:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 490 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, holding that the show cause notice was time-barred as it constituted a change of opinion. Additionally, since the appellant had already reversed the proportionate credit on inputs for the current period, they were not obligated to reverse the Cenvat credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>