https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366750 The case involved a dispute regarding entitlement to SSI benefit under Notification No. 8/2003 for M/s. Steel Craft, manufacturing steel furniture under the brand 'Rastogi'. The department challenged the brand ownership, leading to the confirmation of Central Excise duty but not penalties on partners. The Tribunal overturned the duty demand, rendering penalties unwarranted. Consequently, the department's appeals for penalties on partners were rejected, upholding the Tribunal's decision in favor of the manufacturer. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366750 The case involved a dispute regarding entitlement to SSI benefit under Notification No. 8/2003 for M/s. Steel Craft, manufacturing steel furniture under the brand 'Rastogi'. The department challenged the brand ownership, leading to the confirmation of Central Excise duty but not penalties on partners. The Tribunal overturned the duty demand, rendering penalties unwarranted. Consequently, the department's appeals for penalties on partners were rejected, upholding the Tribunal's decision in favor of the manufacturer. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366750