https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366745 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and directing the first respondent to lift the attachment on the property. The petitioner was required to file an affidavit undertaking not to alienate the property until the proceedings concluded. The Customs Department and Income Tax Department were instructed to furnish necessary details within eight weeks to assist the first respondent in proceeding further based on the directions issued in the previous order. The court emphasized the cooperation of concerned departments in sharing information and holding discussions to protect revenue interests. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366745 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and directing the first respondent to lift the attachment on the property. The petitioner was required to file an affidavit undertaking not to alienate the property until the proceedings concluded. The Customs Department and Income Tax Department were instructed to furnish necessary details within eight weeks to assist the first respondent in proceeding further based on the directions issued in the previous order. The court emphasized the cooperation of concerned departments in sharing information and holding discussions to protect revenue interests. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366745