<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274917</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling in favor of the respondent. The court found no evidence supporting the addition of income from the sale of flats to the respondent&#039;s tax liability. Additionally, the court determined that there were no substantial legal questions requiring a different outcome, as the income from the flats had already been taxed in another individual&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274917</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling in favor of the respondent. The court found no evidence supporting the addition of income from the sale of flats to the respondent&#039;s tax liability. Additionally, the court determined that there were no substantial legal questions requiring a different outcome, as the income from the flats had already been taxed in another individual&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>