https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274918 The court declined to decide on the challenge to the reassessment order and demand notices for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 as the petitioner had an appeal pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), providing an alternative legal remedy. Since no stay application was filed during the appeal process, the court held that the respondents were justified in initiating recovery procedures for the income tax amount. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner had legal recourse through the ongoing appeal process. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:08:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274918 The court declined to decide on the challenge to the reassessment order and demand notices for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 as the petitioner had an appeal pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), providing an alternative legal remedy. Since no stay application was filed during the appeal process, the court held that the respondents were justified in initiating recovery procedures for the income tax amount. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner had legal recourse through the ongoing appeal process. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274918