<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1470 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274922</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the order denying absolute stay of recovery proceedings pending the disposal of an appeal petition before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s imposition of a payment condition was improper, considering the petitioner&#039;s entitlement for exemption under Section 10(21) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the first respondent&#039;s discretion in granting stay, noting the relevance of previous Tribunal orders supporting the petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption. Recovery proceedings were stayed until the appeals were heard and disposed of by the second respondent, maintaining consistency with previous judgments for the same assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1470 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274922</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the order denying absolute stay of recovery proceedings pending the disposal of an appeal petition before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s imposition of a payment condition was improper, considering the petitioner&#039;s entitlement for exemption under Section 10(21) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the first respondent&#039;s discretion in granting stay, noting the relevance of previous Tribunal orders supporting the petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption. Recovery proceedings were stayed until the appeals were heard and disposed of by the second respondent, maintaining consistency with previous judgments for the same assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>