<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366733</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s life insurance surplus adjustments, dividend income, pension fund income, negative reserves and section 14A dispute were already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions in its own case. The Tribunal followed those prior rulings, and because the Revenue produced no contrary authority, the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; deletion of the additions was sustained. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed on all contested grounds, leaving no surviving adjustment in issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:16:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366733</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s life insurance surplus adjustments, dividend income, pension fund income, negative reserves and section 14A dispute were already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions in its own case. The Tribunal followed those prior rulings, and because the Revenue produced no contrary authority, the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; deletion of the additions was sustained. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed on all contested grounds, leaving no surviving adjustment in issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>