<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal found that the disallowed expenses related to Business Promotion were part of regular business practices, incurred for legitimate purposes without any evidence of wrongdoing or violation of law. Therefore, it was concluded that the penalty was not justified, and the orders of the lower authorities were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal found that the disallowed expenses related to Business Promotion were part of regular business practices, incurred for legitimate purposes without any evidence of wrongdoing or violation of law. Therefore, it was concluded that the penalty was not justified, and the orders of the lower authorities were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>