https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366721 An order taking cognizance and issuing summons is not interlocutory and can be challenged in revision. In proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the Court held that mere banking transactions, receipt of funds through accounts, or association with the main accused do not by themselves establish the knowledge or active involvement needed for money laundering. The materials before the Special Court did not disclose a prima facie case of knowing participation in a process connected with proceeds of crime and projection of tainted property as untainted, so the summons order was set aside. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:15:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366721 An order taking cognizance and issuing summons is not interlocutory and can be challenged in revision. In proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the Court held that mere banking transactions, receipt of funds through accounts, or association with the main accused do not by themselves establish the knowledge or active involvement needed for money laundering. The materials before the Special Court did not disclose a prima facie case of knowing participation in a process connected with proceeds of crime and projection of tainted property as untainted, so the summons order was set aside. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366721