https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366716 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of cenvat credit on service tax paid on input services at Unit-II. The Tribunal found that the Revenue's actions were insufficient to invoke the extended period of limitation, given their knowledge of the additional unit since 2006 and lack of rejection of registration requests. The Tribunal held that the order was unsustainable and granted relief to the appellant based on technical grounds, without delving into the merits of the case. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366716 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of cenvat credit on service tax paid on input services at Unit-II. The Tribunal found that the Revenue's actions were insufficient to invoke the extended period of limitation, given their knowledge of the additional unit since 2006 and lack of rejection of registration requests. The Tribunal held that the order was unsustainable and granted relief to the appellant based on technical grounds, without delving into the merits of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366716