<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 447 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366711</link>
    <description>The AAR in Maharashtra allowed JAIDFEP METALLICS &amp;amp; ALLOYS PVT LTD to withdraw its application seeking clarification on an electrically wired trolley&#039;s classification and E-way Bill requirements. The authority granted the withdrawal under section 98 of CGST Act without examining the substantive legal issues, effectively closing the case based on the applicant&#039;s unconditional request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 447 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366711</link>
      <description>The AAR in Maharashtra allowed JAIDFEP METALLICS &amp;amp; ALLOYS PVT LTD to withdraw its application seeking clarification on an electrically wired trolley&#039;s classification and E-way Bill requirements. The authority granted the withdrawal under section 98 of CGST Act without examining the substantive legal issues, effectively closing the case based on the applicant&#039;s unconditional request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>