<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 444 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366708</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling in Maharashtra addressed the withdrawal of an application by Brink&#039;s India Private Limited seeking clarification on exemption eligibility under specific provisions of the CGST Act and MGST Act. The applicant sought rulings on transportation services involving imported goods entirely through road and temporary storage, as well as scenarios involving air and road transportation. However, the applicant voluntarily withdrew the application before detailed examination, and the Authority allowed the withdrawal without providing specific rulings on the issues raised. The proceedings concluded without a formal decision on the exemption eligibility questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 444 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366708</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling in Maharashtra addressed the withdrawal of an application by Brink&#039;s India Private Limited seeking clarification on exemption eligibility under specific provisions of the CGST Act and MGST Act. The applicant sought rulings on transportation services involving imported goods entirely through road and temporary storage, as well as scenarios involving air and road transportation. However, the applicant voluntarily withdrew the application before detailed examination, and the Authority allowed the withdrawal without providing specific rulings on the issues raised. The proceedings concluded without a formal decision on the exemption eligibility questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>