<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1224 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274898</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petitions and dismissed them, with pending applications disposed of accordingly. The order contains no substantive discussion of the underlying central excise controversy and records only the refusal to grant leave.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 11:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1224 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274898</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petitions and dismissed them, with pending applications disposed of accordingly. The order contains no substantive discussion of the underlying central excise controversy and records only the refusal to grant leave.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>