<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1462 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274899</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that no demurrage charges were payable on the seized goods as per Customs regulations. It directed that the goods, now stale and rotten, be auctioned by respondent No. 4 with the proceeds retained, as they were of no use to the appellant. The court disposed of the appeal, considering the changed circumstances and lack of utility of the goods to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 11:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1462 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274899</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that no demurrage charges were payable on the seized goods as per Customs regulations. It directed that the goods, now stale and rotten, be auctioned by respondent No. 4 with the proceeds retained, as they were of no use to the appellant. The court disposed of the appeal, considering the changed circumstances and lack of utility of the goods to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>