<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1588 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274900</link>
    <description>An alternative claim for deduction under section 10A was rejected without examination, so the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after verification of the statutory conditions and supporting documents. The Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s disposal of objections without issue-wise reasons was treated as unsustainable because a quasi-judicial authority must pass a speaking order addressing the objections with cogent reasons; that order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication, followed by assessment. The appeal succeeded only to the extent of remand, and the stay petition did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 11:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1588 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274900</link>
      <description>An alternative claim for deduction under section 10A was rejected without examination, so the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after verification of the statutory conditions and supporting documents. The Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s disposal of objections without issue-wise reasons was treated as unsustainable because a quasi-judicial authority must pass a speaking order addressing the objections with cogent reasons; that order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication, followed by assessment. The appeal succeeded only to the extent of remand, and the stay petition did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>