<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 426 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366690</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of the provision for warranty made by the Assessee, as it failed to meet the conditions recognized by the Supreme Court for allowing such provisions. The lack of material to substantiate the provision led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the substantial question of law decided in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 08:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 426 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366690</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of the provision for warranty made by the Assessee, as it failed to meet the conditions recognized by the Supreme Court for allowing such provisions. The lack of material to substantiate the provision led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the substantial question of law decided in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>