<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 423 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366687</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for fresh adjudication while confirming other disallowances related to unexplained deposits and business promotion expenses. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper documentation and evidence to substantiate expenses and payments, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the nature of payments in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 423 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366687</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for fresh adjudication while confirming other disallowances related to unexplained deposits and business promotion expenses. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper documentation and evidence to substantiate expenses and payments, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the nature of payments in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>