<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 419 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16, deleting additions related to commission income from trading of metals, MCX Dabba trading, and unexplained receipts of Rs. 10 lacs. The judgment highlighted the significance of cross-examination and material evidence in supporting additions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee in all three instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 419 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16, deleting additions related to commission income from trading of metals, MCX Dabba trading, and unexplained receipts of Rs. 10 lacs. The judgment highlighted the significance of cross-examination and material evidence in supporting additions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee in all three instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>