<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay application for a demand of Rs. 125 crores for A.Y. 2010-2011 under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. Despite initial interim protection, the assessee&#039;s continuous requests for adjournments demonstrated a lack of commitment to advancing the appeals. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely resolution of tax disputes and compliance with directives, leading to the decision to vacate the interim order and dismiss the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay application for a demand of Rs. 125 crores for A.Y. 2010-2011 under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. Despite initial interim protection, the assessee&#039;s continuous requests for adjournments demonstrated a lack of commitment to advancing the appeals. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely resolution of tax disputes and compliance with directives, leading to the decision to vacate the interim order and dismiss the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>