<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 393 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366657</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 by the Commissioner through revisionary power, ruling that penalties cannot be enhanced without proper justification. Citing legal precedents, including the High Court&#039;s clarification that penalties under Sections 76 and 78 are mutually exclusive, the Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of fraud or misrepresentation before imposing penalties under Section 78. The decision underscored the significance of determining service tax accurately and the discretion of authorities in penalty imposition. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 393 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366657</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 by the Commissioner through revisionary power, ruling that penalties cannot be enhanced without proper justification. Citing legal precedents, including the High Court&#039;s clarification that penalties under Sections 76 and 78 are mutually exclusive, the Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of fraud or misrepresentation before imposing penalties under Section 78. The decision underscored the significance of determining service tax accurately and the discretion of authorities in penalty imposition. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>