<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 384 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366648</link>
    <description>Supply and erection of a fire hydrant system was treated as a composite activity involving both supply and installation, and on those facts it fell within Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services rather than Works Contract Service. The service tax liability was computed after extending the benefit of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006, and the demand was sustained on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 384 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366648</link>
      <description>Supply and erection of a fire hydrant system was treated as a composite activity involving both supply and installation, and on those facts it fell within Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services rather than Works Contract Service. The service tax liability was computed after extending the benefit of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006, and the demand was sustained on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>