<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1633 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting depreciation at the rate of 60% for the purchase of design software by the assessee, a private limited company in the petrochemical business. Despite the initial denial of the claim by the Ld.AO and the partial relief granted by the Ld.CIT(A), the Tribunal ruled that the purchase constituted design software falling under computer software as per Note 7 of the Rules, thereby directing the Ld.AO to allow the higher depreciation rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1633 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting depreciation at the rate of 60% for the purchase of design software by the assessee, a private limited company in the petrochemical business. Despite the initial denial of the claim by the Ld.AO and the partial relief granted by the Ld.CIT(A), the Tribunal ruled that the purchase constituted design software falling under computer software as per Note 7 of the Rules, thereby directing the Ld.AO to allow the higher depreciation rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>