https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274882 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for service tax liability under "Man Power Recruitment or Supply Agency Service." It found discrepancies in statements by sugarcane farmers regarding labor arrangements and aligned the case facts with legal precedents cited by the appellants' advocate. By comparing practices during the disputed period with subsequent orders and emphasizing consistency in labor arrangements, the tribunal concluded that the appellants were not liable for the service tax. The decision provided detailed reasoning based on established legal principles, granting consequential benefits to the appellants. en-us Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274882 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for service tax liability under "Man Power Recruitment or Supply Agency Service." It found discrepancies in statements by sugarcane farmers regarding labor arrangements and aligned the case facts with legal precedents cited by the appellants' advocate. By comparing practices during the disputed period with subsequent orders and emphasizing consistency in labor arrangements, the tribunal concluded that the appellants were not liable for the service tax. The decision provided detailed reasoning based on established legal principles, granting consequential benefits to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274882