<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 374 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366638</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner withdrew it. The petitioner sought the bank guarantee to remain in force pending appeal. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) will address this request and decide on the substantive issues without being impeded by limitation concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 374 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366638</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner withdrew it. The petitioner sought the bank guarantee to remain in force pending appeal. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) will address this request and decide on the substantive issues without being impeded by limitation concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>