<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 932 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274866</link>
    <description>In writ proceedings seeking production of answer scripts, the Court&#039;s direction for pre-trial deposit is a matter of judicial discretion and procedural security, so no fixed ceiling can be imposed as a rule of law; the amount must depend on the facts, the examinee&#039;s hardship, and the likely expense. A deposit order does not create a vested right in the Council to retain the amount, and res judicata does not apply because the order is not a substantive determination of the dispute. The Court may, at final hearing, appropriate the deposited amount towards costs, exercising judicial discretion under the applicable procedural framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 932 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274866</link>
      <description>In writ proceedings seeking production of answer scripts, the Court&#039;s direction for pre-trial deposit is a matter of judicial discretion and procedural security, so no fixed ceiling can be imposed as a rule of law; the amount must depend on the facts, the examinee&#039;s hardship, and the likely expense. A deposit order does not create a vested right in the Council to retain the amount, and res judicata does not apply because the order is not a substantive determination of the dispute. The Court may, at final hearing, appropriate the deposited amount towards costs, exercising judicial discretion under the applicable procedural framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>