<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366635</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the order denying transitional credit under Section 140 of the Central General Sales Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order directing the petitioner to reverse the credit within a specified time was a violation of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and the first respondent was directed to proceed afresh in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366635</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the order denying transitional credit under Section 140 of the Central General Sales Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order directing the petitioner to reverse the credit within a specified time was a violation of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and the first respondent was directed to proceed afresh in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>