<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 367 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366631</link>
    <description>HC ruled on goods seizure under UPGST Act. Petitioner challenged seizure order&#039;s legal validity due to lack of specific provision citation. Court directed Standing Counsel to file counter affidavit and provide instructions. Goods and vehicle to be released upon furnishing security equivalent to tax and penalty, with further proceedings timeline established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 367 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366631</link>
      <description>HC ruled on goods seizure under UPGST Act. Petitioner challenged seizure order&#039;s legal validity due to lack of specific provision citation. Court directed Standing Counsel to file counter affidavit and provide instructions. Goods and vehicle to be released upon furnishing security equivalent to tax and penalty, with further proceedings timeline established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>