<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 358 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366622</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner, a company facing income tax scrutiny for share premium categorization, to deposit 5% of the disputed demand within two weeks, expecting resolution of the appeal without further demands until disposal. This decision followed previous orders preventing coercive measures until appeal resolution and a directive for a 10% payment by the petitioner, emphasizing the need for compliance with modified instructions in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:38:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 358 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366622</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner, a company facing income tax scrutiny for share premium categorization, to deposit 5% of the disputed demand within two weeks, expecting resolution of the appeal without further demands until disposal. This decision followed previous orders preventing coercive measures until appeal resolution and a directive for a 10% payment by the petitioner, emphasizing the need for compliance with modified instructions in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>