<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14350</link>
    <description>Section 158BB(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act is explained as a special block-assessment rule for search cases that operates notwithstanding the general return-filing provisions. The provision treats income not disclosed by the due date as undisclosed income and does not permit a person searched after non-disclosure to rely on a belated return under section 139(4). The analysis reasons that filing a return is the legally relevant mode of disclosure and that advance tax payment alone does not amount to disclosure. On that basis, the classification is said to be rational and non-discriminatory within the search-assessment class, and the provision is upheld as constitutionally valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14350</link>
      <description>Section 158BB(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act is explained as a special block-assessment rule for search cases that operates notwithstanding the general return-filing provisions. The provision treats income not disclosed by the due date as undisclosed income and does not permit a person searched after non-disclosure to rely on a belated return under section 139(4). The analysis reasons that filing a return is the legally relevant mode of disclosure and that advance tax payment alone does not amount to disclosure. On that basis, the classification is said to be rational and non-discriminatory within the search-assessment class, and the provision is upheld as constitutionally valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>