https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366613 The appeal in the case was dismissed as it was signed and verified by an unauthorized person, an ex-director of the company. The bench emphasized that appeals must be signed by the person authorized under the Income Tax Rules and Act. Since the ex-director was not the authorized signatory, the appeal was deemed not maintainable, leading to its dismissal without considering the merits of the additions contested. The judgment underscored the necessity of compliance with statutory requirements for signing and verifying appeals before the Tribunal. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:38:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366613 The appeal in the case was dismissed as it was signed and verified by an unauthorized person, an ex-director of the company. The bench emphasized that appeals must be signed by the person authorized under the Income Tax Rules and Act. Since the ex-director was not the authorized signatory, the appeal was deemed not maintainable, leading to its dismissal without considering the merits of the additions contested. The judgment underscored the necessity of compliance with statutory requirements for signing and verifying appeals before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366613