<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 74 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14349</link>
    <description>A defect in verification or signature does not by itself invalidate a return where the return is otherwise in substance compliant with the Act, because such irregularity is curable. However, a revised return filed only after the Revenue has detected a false original claim is not voluntary and cannot attract amnesty where the earlier excessive deduction claim was not shown to be a bona fide mistake. On those facts, the assessee was not entitled to the benefit of the amnesty scheme, and the challenge to rejection of that benefit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 74 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14349</link>
      <description>A defect in verification or signature does not by itself invalidate a return where the return is otherwise in substance compliant with the Act, because such irregularity is curable. However, a revised return filed only after the Revenue has detected a false original claim is not voluntary and cannot attract amnesty where the earlier excessive deduction claim was not shown to be a bona fide mistake. On those facts, the assessee was not entitled to the benefit of the amnesty scheme, and the challenge to rejection of that benefit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>