https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366601 The text explains that company-law jurisdiction may be removed by necessary implication when a later statutory scheme covers the same field and is inconsistent with the earlier arrangement. It further states that parties have no vested right to continue in a particular forum once the legislature substitutes a tribunal and transfers pending matters. On Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, the words "all" and "including" are treated as expansive, extending to pending proceedings under the earlier company law regime. It also notes that Section 68 of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 was impliedly repealed as inconsistent with the later scheme. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:37:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366601 The text explains that company-law jurisdiction may be removed by necessary implication when a later statutory scheme covers the same field and is inconsistent with the earlier arrangement. It further states that parties have no vested right to continue in a particular forum once the legislature substitutes a tribunal and transfers pending matters. On Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, the words "all" and "including" are treated as expansive, extending to pending proceedings under the earlier company law regime. It also notes that Section 68 of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 was impliedly repealed as inconsistent with the later scheme. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366601