<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 329 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366593</link>
    <description>The court directed the Deputy Commissioner of Customs to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s refund claim, emphasizing the need to resolve factual disputes surrounding duty exemption, payment under protest, and refund requests under the Customs Act. The court highlighted discrepancies in evidence and ordered a fresh evaluation based on all relevant factors, aiming for a reasoned decision in line with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 329 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366593</link>
      <description>The court directed the Deputy Commissioner of Customs to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s refund claim, emphasizing the need to resolve factual disputes surrounding duty exemption, payment under protest, and refund requests under the Customs Act. The court highlighted discrepancies in evidence and ordered a fresh evaluation based on all relevant factors, aiming for a reasoned decision in line with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>