https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366588 The court dismissed the petition, finding it frivolous and an abuse of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) jurisdiction. It emphasized the importance of maintaining the purity and sanctity of PILs and discouraged petitions filed with ulterior motives. The court imposed exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 on the petitioner, to be deposited with the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru, within 30 days, with further instructions for recovery if not paid. The funds were designated for the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority to support the Victim Compensation Scheme, underscoring the court's stance against misuse of the judicial process. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:06:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366588 The court dismissed the petition, finding it frivolous and an abuse of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) jurisdiction. It emphasized the importance of maintaining the purity and sanctity of PILs and discouraged petitions filed with ulterior motives. The court imposed exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 on the petitioner, to be deposited with the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru, within 30 days, with further instructions for recovery if not paid. The funds were designated for the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority to support the Victim Compensation Scheme, underscoring the court's stance against misuse of the judicial process. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366588