<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 318 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366582</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the impugned Order-in-Appeal, confirming the service tax liability on multi system operator services since 10.9.2004, invoking the extended time proviso under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, and imposing the penalty under Section 78. The appellants&#039; arguments regarding lack of awareness and reliance on past circulars were dismissed, emphasizing their duty to stay informed of legal changes and fulfill tax obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 318 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366582</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the impugned Order-in-Appeal, confirming the service tax liability on multi system operator services since 10.9.2004, invoking the extended time proviso under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, and imposing the penalty under Section 78. The appellants&#039; arguments regarding lack of awareness and reliance on past circulars were dismissed, emphasizing their duty to stay informed of legal changes and fulfill tax obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>