<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 316 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for quantification of the credit reversal amount, lifting penalties. The appellant is liable for interest, and the appeal was allowed for remand due to interpretational issues regarding the eligibility of credit for common input services used for both taxable services and trading without separate accounts maintenance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 07:59:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 316 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for quantification of the credit reversal amount, lifting penalties. The appellant is liable for interest, and the appeal was allowed for remand due to interpretational issues regarding the eligibility of credit for common input services used for both taxable services and trading without separate accounts maintenance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>