https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366577 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, stating that denial of credit on input service due to lack of separate registration for the premise was not valid. The appellant's argument was supported by relevant case law, and the Tribunal found the denial of credit for renting of immovable property service contradictory given the acknowledgment of mixed services provided from the premise. The reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) was deemed unsustainable, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366577 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, stating that denial of credit on input service due to lack of separate registration for the premise was not valid. The appellant's argument was supported by relevant case law, and the Tribunal found the denial of credit for renting of immovable property service contradictory given the acknowledgment of mixed services provided from the premise. The reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) was deemed unsustainable, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366577