<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 57 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14344</link>
    <description>Failure to deduct borrowed money and liabilities from the gross value of assets while computing capital for section 80-I was held to be a rectifiable mistake once the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Lohia Machines Ltd. removed the earlier debate on the issue. The court held that, because the point was no longer debatable, section 154 could be invoked to correct the computation error. The question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:02:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 57 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14344</link>
      <description>Failure to deduct borrowed money and liabilities from the gross value of assets while computing capital for section 80-I was held to be a rectifiable mistake once the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Lohia Machines Ltd. removed the earlier debate on the issue. The court held that, because the point was no longer debatable, section 154 could be invoked to correct the computation error. The question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>