<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 300 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366564</link>
    <description>Amounts deposited during the pendency of KVAT appeals were treated as colourless deposits awaiting final disposal, not as payments first appropriable towards interest under the ordinary rule. The court read the Karasamadhana Scheme-2017 as a self-contained settlement mechanism intended to grant waiver of a substantial part of penalty and interest on payment of arrears. To preserve that object, the appeal-stage deposits had to be adjusted first towards tax, and only then against penalty and interest arrears. On that construction, rejection of the assessees&#039; applications was unsustainable, and the scheme benefit remained available on the basis of tax-first adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 300 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366564</link>
      <description>Amounts deposited during the pendency of KVAT appeals were treated as colourless deposits awaiting final disposal, not as payments first appropriable towards interest under the ordinary rule. The court read the Karasamadhana Scheme-2017 as a self-contained settlement mechanism intended to grant waiver of a substantial part of penalty and interest on payment of arrears. To preserve that object, the appeal-stage deposits had to be adjusted first towards tax, and only then against penalty and interest arrears. On that construction, rejection of the assessees&#039; applications was unsustainable, and the scheme benefit remained available on the basis of tax-first adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>