https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366561 In a petition concerning criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 IPC arising from disputes linked to seizure and release of articles under the U.P. Value Added Tax regime, the HC directed issuance of notice to the opposite party and stayed further proceedings in the criminal case until the next date of listing. The operative effect was interim protection to the petitioner while the petition remained pending for further consideration. The text indicates that such interim relief may be granted by restraining continuation of the criminal case pending notice and judicial review. en-us Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Sep 2018 07:03:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366561 In a petition concerning criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 IPC arising from disputes linked to seizure and release of articles under the U.P. Value Added Tax regime, the HC directed issuance of notice to the opposite party and stayed further proceedings in the criminal case until the next date of listing. The operative effect was interim protection to the petitioner while the petition remained pending for further consideration. The text indicates that such interim relief may be granted by restraining continuation of the criminal case pending notice and judicial review. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366561