https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274853 An efficacious statutory appeal under the A.P. Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987 weighed against entertaining the writ petition, so the petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy, with limited protection only to enable filing of the appeal. The Court also noted that recovery of the same alleged luxury tax liability could not proceed simultaneously through two State authorities; any dispute between them over entitlement to collect was to be resolved inter se and not at the petitioner's expense. Accordingly, further coercive or parallel action was restrained until the liability and collection issue was decided in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Sep 2018 07:00:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274853 An efficacious statutory appeal under the A.P. Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987 weighed against entertaining the writ petition, so the petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy, with limited protection only to enable filing of the appeal. The Court also noted that recovery of the same alleged luxury tax liability could not proceed simultaneously through two State authorities; any dispute between them over entitlement to collect was to be resolved inter se and not at the petitioner's expense. Accordingly, further coercive or parallel action was restrained until the liability and collection issue was decided in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274853