https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274831 A rent-default ground under the Bombay Rent Act had to rest on a valid demand notice and an existing cause of action when suit was filed; default arising later could not be added by amendment to sustain eviction. Acquisition of alternate suitable residence was not established because service quarters had to be surrendered after retirement. Non-user was proved where the premises were not used for the let purpose for six continuous months before suit, and concurrent findings on that issue were not shown to be perverse in supervisory review. Unexplained third-party occupation also justified an inference of unlawful subletting, so eviction was sustained on non-user and subletting. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:02:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274831 A rent-default ground under the Bombay Rent Act had to rest on a valid demand notice and an existing cause of action when suit was filed; default arising later could not be added by amendment to sustain eviction. Acquisition of alternate suitable residence was not established because service quarters had to be surrendered after retirement. Non-user was proved where the premises were not used for the let purpose for six continuous months before suit, and concurrent findings on that issue were not shown to be perverse in supervisory review. Unexplained third-party occupation also justified an inference of unlawful subletting, so eviction was sustained on non-user and subletting. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274831