<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 281 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366545</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes in both Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, directing the CIT(A) to reevaluate the TDS deductibility issue under Sec.194C, 194J, and 194-I. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of a thorough analysis of the relevant provisions before imposing interest under the IT Act, remanding the matters back to the CIT(A) for fresh decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 09:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 281 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366545</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes in both Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, directing the CIT(A) to reevaluate the TDS deductibility issue under Sec.194C, 194J, and 194-I. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of a thorough analysis of the relevant provisions before imposing interest under the IT Act, remanding the matters back to the CIT(A) for fresh decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>