<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366533</link>
    <description>Appeals were remanded to the original authority for fresh disposal because the findings against the appellants were considered similarly deficient to those in the connected matter already remanded. The Tribunal noted that adjudication had to rest on tested evidence and that a fresh decision was necessary to comply with principles of natural justice. The operative result was remand for reconsideration and fresh findings by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 09:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366533</link>
      <description>Appeals were remanded to the original authority for fresh disposal because the findings against the appellants were considered similarly deficient to those in the connected matter already remanded. The Tribunal noted that adjudication had to rest on tested evidence and that a fresh decision was necessary to comply with principles of natural justice. The operative result was remand for reconsideration and fresh findings by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>