https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366529 The Delhi High Court asserted jurisdiction to entertain the petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court found the order flawed as the Enforcement Directorate failed to establish the attached properties as proceeds of crime. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, setting aside the order and emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the attachment. All pending applications were disposed of, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:54:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366529 The Delhi High Court asserted jurisdiction to entertain the petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court found the order flawed as the Enforcement Directorate failed to establish the attached properties as proceeds of crime. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, setting aside the order and emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the attachment. All pending applications were disposed of, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366529