<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 54 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14334</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the inclusion of tax paid by the employer in the assessee&#039;s income during reassessment under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the court supported the revision of the assessment rate based on non-filing of a declaration under section 113(3). The decision emphasized that upon reopening assessments, the Income-tax Officer has the authority to reassess the entire income that escaped assessment, ensuring proper tax levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:43:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 54 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14334</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the inclusion of tax paid by the employer in the assessee&#039;s income during reassessment under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the court supported the revision of the assessment rate based on non-filing of a declaration under section 113(3). The decision emphasized that upon reopening assessments, the Income-tax Officer has the authority to reassess the entire income that escaped assessment, ensuring proper tax levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>