<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 261 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366525</link>
    <description>The High Court deferred to a larger Bench for resolution of the complex legal issue regarding excise duty payments and interest liability. The appellant was granted the right to seek relief, including a refund, once the larger Bench addressed the underlying legal question. The court recognized the unresolved nature of the issue and aimed to provide a pathway for potential future recourse based on the larger Bench&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 261 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366525</link>
      <description>The High Court deferred to a larger Bench for resolution of the complex legal issue regarding excise duty payments and interest liability. The appellant was granted the right to seek relief, including a refund, once the larger Bench addressed the underlying legal question. The court recognized the unresolved nature of the issue and aimed to provide a pathway for potential future recourse based on the larger Bench&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>