<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 253 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that service tax liability should be based on the value recorded in the books of accounts at the time of booking expenditure, not on the actual remittance amount. Emphasizing the prevention of tax arbitrage and alignment with statutory provisions and accounting standards, the Tribunal concluded in favor of the appellant, rejecting the demand upheld by the Commissioner (Appeal) on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 253 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that service tax liability should be based on the value recorded in the books of accounts at the time of booking expenditure, not on the actual remittance amount. Emphasizing the prevention of tax arbitrage and alignment with statutory provisions and accounting standards, the Tribunal concluded in favor of the appellant, rejecting the demand upheld by the Commissioner (Appeal) on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>