https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366515 The High Court declined to entertain a petition challenging a penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, noting the availability of an alternative remedy through appeal under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. Despite this, the Court allowed a condonation of the appeal filing delay, provided it was done within two weeks, acknowledging the petitioner's good faith belief in challenging the order. The Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal with the appellate authority within the specified timeframe and comply with statutory deposit requirements for the appeal to be considered on its merits. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:15:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366515 The High Court declined to entertain a petition challenging a penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, noting the availability of an alternative remedy through appeal under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. Despite this, the Court allowed a condonation of the appeal filing delay, provided it was done within two weeks, acknowledging the petitioner's good faith belief in challenging the order. The Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal with the appellate authority within the specified timeframe and comply with statutory deposit requirements for the appeal to be considered on its merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366515