<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 246 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366510</link>
    <description>The appeal seeking condonation of a delay in filing, rebate of Central Excise duty, and procedural lapses in rebate claim was dismissed. The judge held that the appellate tribunal lacked jurisdiction to decide on rebate of excise duty matters, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal. The appellant&#039;s arguments on jurisdictional interpretation and procedural lapses were considered but deemed insufficient to overturn the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 07:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 246 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366510</link>
      <description>The appeal seeking condonation of a delay in filing, rebate of Central Excise duty, and procedural lapses in rebate claim was dismissed. The judge held that the appellate tribunal lacked jurisdiction to decide on rebate of excise duty matters, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal. The appellant&#039;s arguments on jurisdictional interpretation and procedural lapses were considered but deemed insufficient to overturn the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>